Non-Duality
Vs. Religion
(Excerpt from A Course In Consciousness,
Chapter 12. Nonduality, Religion, and Belief)
Stanley Sobottka Emeritus,
Professor of Physics, University of Virginia
There is an enormous difference
between the natures of the teachings of nonduality and those of religion...
Mankind creates its gods in its own images, and each religion then
justifies its actions by claiming it speaks for God. The more vengeful
and punitive is the god, the more vengeful and punitive are the people
who believe in it... It is no accident that the most peaceful religions
are the ones, like Buddhism, that have no concept of god.
Religions by their very nature are often divisive and exclusionary
because the fear of another religion can be even greater than the
fear of death. When a religion claims its god to be the only true
one, its believers may endeavor to eliminate a competing one by trying
to convert, condemn, or kill its devotees...
Since Truth transcends concepts, Truth cannot be conceptualized. Nonduality
as a teaching contains many concepts, but all of them are meant to
be pointers to Truth that can only be verified by direct experience...
In addition to the fact that spiritual beliefs cannot be true, no
mere conceptual system can ever satisfy the yearning for wholeness
which is the compulsion behind all spiritual seeking. Only direct
seeing can satisfy this, and in the end, only direct seeing can lead
to the realization that the individual does not exist. Because the
intuition is constantly pulling us towards this realization, any practice
based only on mentation rather than on inseeing must strive to ignore
this pulling. Furthermore, any belief system is constantly being challenged
by competing belief systems. The result is that any belief system,
in order to be sustained, requires constant effort at defending it,
reinforcing it, and shoring it up. This effort invariably strengthens
the sense of separation that the belief system is supposed to dissolve.
The sage views the world as a lucid dreamer views his or her dream.
Both see that the dream is not real, are disidentified from it, and
just witness it. The difference is that the sage witnesses from pure
impersonal awareness while the lucid dreamer still thinks of him/herself
as the dreamer.
Comments? Questions? Send them to Professor
Emeritus at ses2r@virginia.edu
|